Imagine leaving your home in search of a better life, only to discover that the place you hoped would offer opportunity has become increasingly hostile to your presence. Across South Africa, that uncertainty has become a daily reality for many African migrants.
A Zimbabwean shop owner opens his store every morning unsure whether customers or protesters will arrive first. Hundreds of kilometres away, a South African mother waits in a government clinic, convinced the country’s struggling healthcare system can no longer cope. Between these two realities stands one woman whose name has become impossible to ignore; Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma. 
To some South Africans, she is a courageous activist saying what many citizens have long believed but were afraid to voice. To others, she represents a movement whose rhetoric risks deepening xenophobia and putting the lives of foreign nationals at greater risk.
Whether admired or criticised, Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma has become one of the most recognisable faces in South Africa’s heated conversation about immigration, unemployment, and national identity.
Who is Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma?
Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma is a South African activist and one of the leading voices behind the “March and March” movement. The group has organised demonstrations calling on the government to enforce immigration laws, strengthen border security, and remove undocumented migrants from the country.
Her growing popularity reflects frustrations shared by many South Africans who believe illegal immigration has placed additional pressure on jobs, healthcare, housing, and other public services.
However, her critics argue that the movement’s messaging unfairly blames migrants for problems rooted in years of economic inequality, poor governance, and high unemployment.
ALSO READ: ‘If I Close, 24 South Africans Lose Their Jobs’: Nigerian Man Warns
Why Her Message Resonates With Many South Africans
South Africa has one of the highest unemployment rates in the world, particularly among young people. Rising living costs, persistent crime, and limited economic opportunities have left many citizens frustrated.
Against this backdrop, Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma’s message has found a receptive audience.
Supporters argue that every country has the right to protect its borders and ensure that immigration laws are respected. They believe undocumented migration places additional strain on already overstretched public resources and makes it harder for citizens to access jobs and essential services.
For many of her followers, the issue is not about rejecting foreigners but about demanding accountability from the government.
The Thin Line Between Immigration Activism and Xenophobia
While calls for stronger border control are not unusual, many human rights organisations have expressed concern that the language used during some anti-immigration campaigns may fuel hostility toward foreign nationals.
South Africa has experienced several waves of xenophobic violence over the past two decades, with migrants from countries including Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Somalia, and Ethiopia becoming targets of attacks.
Many African migrants contribute to the country’s economy as business owners, skilled workers, professionals, and employees. Yet during periods of economic hardship, they are often blamed for challenges that have far more complex causes.
This is where the debate becomes particularly sensitive.
Critics argue that while governments should address undocumented immigration, reducing the issues of unemployment or crime to the presence of migrants oversimplifies matters that require broader economic and political solutions.
Why Jacinta’s Rise Reflects Deeper National Frustrations
Perhaps Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma’s rise says less about one activist and more about the frustrations many South Africans have carried for years.
High youth unemployment, slow economic growth, inadequate service delivery, and public distrust of government have created fertile ground for movements promising decisive action.
Immigration has therefore become a symbol of wider public dissatisfaction rather than the sole cause of South Africa’s challenges. For many citizens, the debate reflects deeper concerns about economic opportunities, public services, and confidence in government institutions.
What This Means for Africa
The debate extends beyond South Africa.
Across the continent, millions of Africans live, study, and work outside their home countries. Businesses depend on regional trade, while families are increasingly spread across borders.
As governments seek to balance national security with regional cooperation, the challenge will be finding policies that uphold the rule of law without encouraging discrimination or violence against fellow Africans.
The African Union’s vision of greater integration depends not only on open borders but also on mutual respect, responsible governance, and economic opportunities that reduce the desperation driving migration in the first place.
Final Thoughts
Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma has become far more than an activist. She now represents one of the most difficult conversations facing modern South Africa: how to balance border security, economic hardship, and human dignity.
Her supporters see her as a champion for citizens demanding action. Her critics see her as a figure whose message could inflame xenophobia.
Whichever view prevails, one thing is clear: until governments tackle unemployment, inequality, and weak migration management, the debate surrounding immigration is unlikely to disappear.
The real challenge is ensuring that the search for solutions does not come at the expense of the unity and shared humanity that Africa has long aspired to uphold. Whether Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma becomes remembered as a reformer or a controversial figure may ultimately depend on how South Africa chooses to confront the challenges she has brought into the spotlight. The debate she has ignited is about far more than one activist—it is about the kind of society South Africans want to build.
SEE ALSO: South Africa Faces the Worst Unemployment Crisis in Africa
About The Author
